

That is why I feel that ARM chips on Windows will take a long time to become attractive even with Qualcomm doubling down on making a good SOC to compete with Intel on Windows. But when you start using Windows which is very fragmented, I feel you will lose a lot of performance due to inefficiency/ poor optimisation. The fast SOC aside, the other factor that makes the M1 based systems fast is because of the tight software integration with the hardware. Only time I struggle is when I use it for work running a virtualised Windows system on it and I can't get some of the usual Windows/ Microsoft Office shortcut keys to work on the Mac keyboard.


And after giving the MacBook Air M1 a try, I rarely miss my tablet or Windows computer. I've not used a Mac for 15 years now since the last MacBook Pro I purchased. There is no point getting a Mac to run Windows primarily.
Parallels desktop for mac latest version full#
I would love to see a full review down the road that caters to hardcore PC users.I feel if you go for a Mac, and I feel you should give it a try, running Windows should be secondary. This enables our users to enjoy the best Windows-on-Mac experience available."ĬerianK said:I have not used a Mac for 30 years, but this announcement, combined with the M1's power/performance, seems to remove a major obstacle that had driven me away from Macs. However, virtual machines are an exception and thus Parallels engineers implemented native virtualization support for the Mac with M1 chip. "Apple's M1 chip is a significant breakthrough for Mac users," said Nick Dobrovolskiy, Parallels Senior Vice President of Engineering and Support. "The transition has been smooth for most Mac applications, thanks to Rosetta technology. If they say Ubuntu is supported, then the latest version should work, regardless of what version.
Parallels desktop for mac latest version install#
